A request moves forward,
expertise stays available.
The workflow begins with a question. It continues with an answer or a legal professional’s intervention. Knowledge worth reusing remains subject to approval.
Email remains an entry point
The business user states a need. Context travels with the request and lets the legal team follow the exchanges.
Illustrative scenario. Not a product screenshot.
Hello,
Where can I find the approved process for sending a new contract to the legal team?
Thank you!
Elena
A useful answer, or the right handoff
CLEM brings in approved knowledge when it can answer. Otherwise, the legal professional takes ownership of the request.
Whether an answer is available depends on the context and approved knowledge.
The answer draws on your organization’s approved process and explains what to do next.
Illustrative workflow — not a product screenshot.
Approval, then reuse
What can be used again is kept separate from matter-specific information. Knowledge building is not automatic: it applies to knowledge that has been explicitly approved.
The matter keeps its context
An answer does not tell the whole story. Exchanges, interventions, and follow-up belong to the request’s journey. Exadvize maintains that continuity instead of isolating an answer from its context.
Core focuses on advice and follow-up. Flow extends the workflow to document work and negotiations. Future Agent capabilities remain clearly identified as such.