Imagine your appeal being processed by an algorithm before it even reaches a judge’s desk.
Fiction? Not anymore.
Since 2019, France’s highest court has quietly been integrating artificial intelligence into its inner workings, but this isn’t about a robot-judge handing down decisions. The reality is far more nuanced.
This silent revolution begins with seemingly simple tasks:
- automatic pseudonymization of rulings;
- routing of ampliative briefs.
Behind this simplicity lies a strategy that is subtle, rigorous, and deliberate.
This model stands in sharp contrast to the “fully automated” approach of some legaltechs.
Here, no flashy disruption — but measured innovation that deserves attention. Because behind every algorithm deployed on rue de Harlay lies a crucial question: 👉 how far can we delegate to machines without betraying the very essence of the law?
The Court’s method commands respect.
Each use case is filtered through three strict criteria:
✔️ Ethical: Are fundamental rights preserved?
✔️ Legal: Is it compliant with the GDPR and the EU AI Regulation?
✔️ Functional: Are the benefits measurable?
The magistrates have resisted the temptation of “full outsourcing.”, instead, they created their own innovation lab with an internal data science team.
The result?
➡️ Full control of the systems
➡️ Sovereign hosting of the Republic’s most sensitive data
This approach reveals a clear philosophy:
AI as an amplifier of human intelligence — never a substitute.
Algorithms sort, classify, correlate.
Judges analyze, interpret, decide.
One revealing detail: No experimentation in decision support has even been considered.
Some may see this as excessive caution.
Others, as a rare form of institutional wisdom in an age of technological frenzy.
Between technological stagnation and blind disruption, 👉 is the Court charting a middle path for the legal world?
